Search
Sign in
Location: Greenhithe, Kent, DA9 9XJ
Built: 2001
Designer: Crest Nicholson (developer) / Gardner Stewart Architects (architect) with Tibbalds TM2 (urban designers)
Type: urban
Density: 95 homes per hectare
Parking ratio: 160%
Design quality brought housebuyers to a Thames Gateway site next to the Dartford Crossing. Some areas dependent on allocated spaces have faced parking issues, but treatments are diverse, including Kentish stable doors for garaging, and amenity over garages.
The scheme is built around generous amounts of soft landscaping, presenting the development as a sequence of separate spaces. So there are houses
set around a crescent shaped green with a grass surface laid to the natural grade; and there are tree lined boulevards with gravelled edges adjoining granite kerbs and wide grass verges. Brick arched gatehouse buildings give access to streets and pavements finished with precast setts. A proportion of the 950 homes of Ingress Park are located in a five-storey apartment block, the subjective scale of which sits uncomfortably with adjacent buildings.
The scheme was one of the first to apply reduced parking ratios to a major new housing development: in areas where spaces are mostly allocated on plot, notably in integral garages, there are obvious problems with capacity as the garage is ignored and the car parked in front of properties with two wheels on the pavement.
But other treatments are diverse and often well executed. Simple layby parking is provided to the edges of the green; the apartment block sits over a rusticated brick undercroft vented at high level through grillage in medievally deep openings. The close-style housing has hardstandings finished in blacktop (perhaps also usable as visitor bays), and slate roofed garages in pairs for residents; the garages are accessed from streets paved in multi-coloured squares.
The red multi-stock brick townhouses use integral garages with arched openings at street level; in front of these are parking bays, which will offer some unallocated capacity for visitors, marked on blacktop hardstanding adjoining the square paviors. Raised dimpled areas are located near some buildings in an attempt to deter on street parking immediately next to windows and entrance doors.
The actual density of the scheme varies between 40 and 150 homes to the hectare, and uses a variety of building forms including 2, 2.5 , 3 and 3.5 storey terraces; as well as a 4.5 storey apartment block with basement. The development features a mix of 1 and 2 bed flats, as well as 3 and 4 bed townhouses.
Treatment B - Good surveillance from houses onto cars.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment D - Undercroft lifts ground floor level up so it can have a more private outside terrace.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment B - Run of bays broken with trees also makes crossing road easier for pedestrians.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment C - French windows connect amenity space to house.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment C - Amenity space overlooks landscaping, not housing.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment C - Bay windows used to compensate for loss of street-level windows to garage.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment A - Plan showing typical arrangement of off-plot, rear-court parking treatment.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment B - Plan showing typical arrangement of on-street parking treatment in-line with pavement.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment D - Plan showing typical arrangement of off-plot, undercroft parking treatment.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment C - Plan showing typical arrangement of on-plot chauffeur unit parking treatment.
Be the first to add a comment!
Some areas at Ingress Park - especially those with residents' parking to the rear and limited visitor parking in front - lead to issues.
Be the first to add a comment!
Plan showing location of case studies for typical parking treatments (A) off-plot, rear court and on-plot mews court combination, (B) on-street, in-line with pavement, (C) on-plot, chauffeur unit, and (D) off-plot, undercroft, within the wider development.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment C - Section showing typical arrangement of on-plot, chauffeur unit parking treatment.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment A - Steps up make access from mews on street side.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment A - Bay windows compensate for loss of windows to street caused by garages.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment B - On street parking away from the frontage of any one home encourages visitors to use these bays.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment B - Treatment B - On street parking away from the frontage of any one home encourages visitors to use these bays.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment D - Houses are accessed from the front.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment D - Undercroft bays are accessed across an internal court.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment C - Access to the amenity deck is a first floor bridge.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment A - Arch enhances court’s sense of defensible space.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment D - Houses are accessed from the front.
Be the first to add a comment!
Treatment A - Garages are designed to look like Kentish stable doors.
Be the first to add a comment!
Space submitted by Sam Brown
17 October 2013